
12-22-2002, 10:37 PM
|
 |
they say im slooooow eh?
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: canada... eh?
Posts: 1,255
|
|
Rmyc, do you have some ACTUAL, real life pictures of it? I want to see some, because I want to make this, just because I want my car to go faster!
Thanx!
|

01-02-2003, 04:53 PM
|
|
TinyRC Pro
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19
|
|
|
sorry lads this would work but there is one flaw tell me what you have when the bit is neither in forwad or reverse. the 2nd battery is being shorted through two diodes which for this to work would have had to be schotkey diodes as they have a forwad voltage drop of somthing like 0.1v
it is however possible to do it without having reverse ill post the diagram in a sec its very simple but you will need a schotkey diode as its the best type of diode for this sort of application.
i ahve just realised that even if you put this battery directly conected to the motor instead of the bit's circut board. the curent the extra 1.5 v will produce becuase I = v/r will still go through the transistors on the circuit board thus not really releaving the strain that an extra cell would add.
it would however only straign the motor controll transistors and not the steering circuity and the radio receiver like just adding another cell to the input of the bits pcb so it may still be worth it but then without reverse.
you could stop the short circuit of the 2nd battery by having enough diodes to drop the voltage to more than 1.5 volts but then this will slow down the car as well.
|

01-02-2003, 05:10 PM
|
|
TinyRC Pro
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19
|
|
|
you can omit all the diodes if you are only planning to run two cells as when put in reverse all that happens is that 1.5v is put to the 1.5v of the other cell as there is not potential difference no curent will flow if there is one will charge up the other.
but if you want to run more than two extra cells then there will be a potential difference when the car is put in reverse and the.
the qustion is when the car is in idle does the cars controll circuitry leave the circuit closed or open as if it is closed the extra batter will cause the motor to continue to spin and not stop.
in the long run it may be worth just wireing the two batterys to the pcb board and replacing any burnt out components if they blow.
does anyone know what parts the fets are and if they can be replaced with heavier duty ones
|

01-04-2003, 06:06 PM
|
|
TinyRC Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 19
|
|
I was just wondering if anyone had thought of finding/useing relays to do this.
In my Full size daily driver jeep I just upgraded the head lights to much higher power units (95 watt low/140watt high beam, off road use only.) to keep from melting the stock wires will all of the extra juice being pulled I had to install a relay system. What the realy basically does is create 2 circuts...one running the stock power the other running the much higher power. the stock power is then used to drive a kind of switch that can handle the current flow of the high power side. Its hard to discribe with out some pics....soooo...follow this link to see how it was done for car head lights.
http://lighting.mbz.org/tech/relays/relays.html
Anyway with a Relay system the Bit's onboard curcits would think they are running the stock power, but in reality they would be running the Relay which in turn would do the actual switching on/off of the much higher powered batterys, keeping all of that extra juice far, far, far away from the important stuff.
Now for actually making it go.....you've got me there, I'm not even sure the parts exist small enough to make this happen, but i thought it might help point someone in the right direction.
--B
Last edited by brandxman; 01-05-2003 at 12:24 AM.
|

01-05-2003, 12:22 AM
|
|
|
|
this 2 cell mod is pretty cool. some pics and stuff of the real thing would be nice though... thanks
|

01-12-2003, 01:20 AM
|
 |
Perfected Bit Modder
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 303
|
|
|
hey ya'll
i finaly had gutts to try soldering .( note to all...i used a lighter.. way lazy to use my goot)
and i did my 2 cell safe circuit. it works great .
i did a 3 cel conv. , but it took up alot of space and it was wheel'n and flip'n alot.
any ways here's the pic of the finished diodes
**will post pics of the unwrapped diodes later
|

02-27-2003, 04:50 PM
|
 |
Retarded Stunt Driver
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Piksberg
Posts: 1,974
|
|
|
this is smart but not needed i think. ive put together 5 or 6 dual cells so far and nothing has fried. an easier way to remedy would be to ad a fuse if you are that worried. then you risk blowing up nothing.
|

02-27-2003, 09:22 PM
|
 |
TinyRC Pro
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: wouldn't u like to know
Posts: 25
|
|
????
ummmmmm yeah im sorry but thats all confusing to me
__________________
JuDgE nOt LeSt Ye Be JuDgEd YoUrSeLf
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.
|
|