
09-26-2002, 09:08 PM
|
 |
IRON MAN OF BIT RACING
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 312
|
|
|
ill be the first
well i got a zip zap and i have to syait pretty good its not as fast i would like it but hey i like the whole idea of the mustangs and cruisers and the fast and the furious kit is great (thats wath i bought) i didnt like the movie but i like the detail on the car zip zaps are the best clone ive found so far
__________________
MY NEW CUSTOMIZED BIT:
red ae86 with zipzap spoiler
carbon fiber hood
3.8 motor (well, it doesnt want to run now)
qfm springs
back wheels on front and back
8.25:1 gearing
rare earth magnet steering
|

09-26-2002, 09:46 PM
|
|
TinyRC Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10
|
|
|
i got the zipzaps too. so far so good but like you said, it's not as powerful.
|

09-26-2002, 10:03 PM
|
 |
I really should change my title...
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: home of the Sopranos
Posts: 130
|
|
|
its not as powerful probably because it is larger and heavier than the bits
__________________
when you've tried everything and you still lose, there is only one answer, NOS
|

09-26-2002, 10:33 PM
|
 |
smoove operator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: East Coast Reprezent'n
Posts: 1,049
|
|
I agree about the lack of power and I think that the intrest of the "NOS" motor, which is only 23,000+ rpm, will quickly be outlived. And forget about putting a bit motor in, there's just not enough tourqe to push the heavier zz. I tried my 2.6 in there and it ran slower than the stock 1.6 of the zz
Hopefully someone will disect the zz motor and make some kick@ss aftermarket 4.0's or 5.0's
|

09-26-2002, 10:39 PM
|
 |
I really should change my title...
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: home of the Sopranos
Posts: 130
|
|
ya. that would be cool. with a 5.0 motor, those zip zaps would kick a$$!  anyway, I wonder why the bit motor didn't work in it. are the zip zap motors any bigger in size than bit char motors? and would anyone suggest buying a zip zap cuz I was in radio shack today and was contemplatin buying one, but I decided to wait and see what other people think of them. so, IS IT WORTH THE $20??
__________________
when you've tried everything and you still lose, there is only one answer, NOS
|

09-26-2002, 10:46 PM
|
 |
SPEED IS GOOD
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 257
|
|
|
If you have a bit char-g right now you should just buy the tune up set for the ZZ's. Most of the parts on the ZZ tune up set are compatible with the Bits. I have a question.......has anyone put the "NOS" motor in the bit char-g yet???
|

09-26-2002, 10:48 PM
|
 |
I really should change my title...
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: home of the Sopranos
Posts: 130
|
|
so what is and what isn't compatible with the bit in the ZZ tune up kit? do the bodies fit on? do the motors fit in the bit? do the tires fit on a bit? stabilizer bars? axles?
__________________
when you've tried everything and you still lose, there is only one answer, NOS
|

09-26-2002, 11:01 PM
|
 |
smoove operator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: East Coast Reprezent'n
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chris
so what is and what isn't compatible with the bit in the ZZ tune up kit? do the bodies fit on? do the motors fit in the bit? do the tires fit on a bit? stabilizer bars? axles?
|
No the bodies don't fit, zz's are 1/64th scale and bits are 1/72th scale.
Motors can fit in the bit with a little finegling, but as i said before vice versa does'nt seem to work to well.
Yes the stabilizers are cross compatable.
The axels on the zz's are longer than the bit's. I tried to put the bit axels on the zz but no luck too short it kept locking up, so I took the rims off the zz axel and replaced them some spare bit rims. For the front I did the same, so i've got bit rims all around. (personally I think it looks better)
|

09-26-2002, 11:06 PM
|
 |
I really should change my title...
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: home of the Sopranos
Posts: 130
|
|
hmmm. I guess I should just get a zip zap then since only a few things are compatible in the tuner kit. why buy it if you are only going to use 3 or 4 parts from it. oh yeah, and I know I am going to sound like a cpmplete newbie, but wat is the point of having hard,soft, and medium stabilizer bars. what difference would it make performance-wise  (I'm just Chock-full-O questions tonight!!)
__________________
when you've tried everything and you still lose, there is only one answer, NOS
|

09-26-2002, 11:18 PM
|
|
TinyRC Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10
|
|
|
I got around to replacing the wire antennae and it improved the reception a couple of feet. I also took apart the remote control but it doesn't appear to have the exact same layout as the others. If anyone has any other modification to improve antennae reception/performance, please let us all know.
BTW, for those who already bought the zz with the fast and furious kit, what combinations do you find to be the best? I'm using the NOS motor w/ the green gear and 3rd stabilizer. Everything appears okay and it's faster than the stock but of course the car seems to drift at high speed.
|

09-26-2002, 11:22 PM
|
 |
smoove operator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: East Coast Reprezent'n
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chris
what is the point of having hard,soft, and medium stabilizer bars. what difference would it make performance-wise (I'm just Chock-full-O questions tonight!!)
|
Welp my experience has been finding the right combination based around what motor you're using.
For example my bB has:
2.6 motor
soft stabalizer (better in the corners, less tension on the body)
medium tires in the front
soft in the rear
lowered the body on the chassis in the front
My Supra is running:
2.2 motor
custom modified stock stabilizer (I shaved it down a bit so the car would sit lower but has a little more tension, I've found that the Supra flips over more easily) again a better combo for cornering.
Soft tires in the front and medium in the rear
So far this is the best combo I've found for my driving style. Full throttle
|

09-27-2002, 06:55 AM
|
|
Bus Driver!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 455
|
|
|
The basic concept of half charger/ half transmitter is the same but exactly how it does it is different. Some thing like how it modulates and connect the buffer-final to the antenna are different. The output filter is different. Other items like generation of the tones values could be different due to changes in a resistor value on the TX2 IC.
I would strongly recommend dont monkey with the output! Dont start clipping parts since all are needed. The designed was set up to meet FCC reg on output power level and spur's. Esp the way it modulates the RF with the signals from the TX2 IC. Its different than a Bit. The odds are you would decrease the range or muck up how it modulates the signal so in effect your transmitter is dead if you start clipping parts.
|

10-09-2002, 10:52 PM
|
|
TinyRC Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 11
|
|
Battery life?
jhandel,
How long do the batteries last before you have to swap them?
|

10-10-2002, 09:24 AM
|
 |
Microrcfool
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 99
|
|
|
yes please post a schematic for us i'd like to see how that's done.
__________________
"What's a low fool?" lol
|

10-10-2002, 09:26 AM
|
|
Bus Driver!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 455
|
|
|
If you dont mind. If you have a schematic of the "boot" battery add on, they may be a way to use a diode to block the charge voltage but let it work when not charging.
Have done strange switches with diodes over the year.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.
|
|