MT duals? Well, maybe not . . . .

[makg]

uhh no

[rfnagel]

Originally posted by TheOldGuyHere
Grammar.

Thanks for that info, I edited and corrected the original message post <G> -

[hothotheat]

no offense but i think its kind silly lokking but original idea so keep it up

Originally posted by hothotheat
no offense but i think its kind silly lokking but original idea so keep it up

You're telling someone who probably doesn't even use the board anymore. Try to watch digging up old posts unless you have a specific question about something.

[hothotheat]

srry

[chilli_mp138]

Originally posted by Jazz32
You're telling someone who probably doesn't even use the board anymore.

Jazz32--

I'm still here, and read the threads each day. I've chosen to be silent so as not to provoke further arguments among misunderstanding people. When I have some mods or data to contribution, you can be sure I'll announce on this forum of their presence on my ZZ website. Your work here is appreciated.

hothotheat--

Yeah, it looks silly, but I'm not sure I'd walk up to one of my farm friends and tell him his giant articulated tractor with duals all the way around looks silly! I've built a double articulated truck that's steered through a center joint, but it has single wheels all the way around only. Maybe with a larger motor I could get the jack screw to crank the front end around if it had duals front and back. I'm glad you revived the subject--now I'll have to build more duals and try it.

chilli

Hey,

Sorry, I guess i didn't even double check who started the thread. Your site is good, i've used it in the past.

As for looking silly... meh, some people want to make things look good, others want to make them peform well. All types have their place.