
09-30-2003, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Tiny RC Guru
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: asheville,NC
Posts: 271
|
|
|
reverse speed?
|

09-30-2003, 03:26 PM
|
|
Master Debater
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 312
|
|
|
Everyone elses does that too. It is normal.
|

09-30-2003, 03:53 PM
|
|
|
yep. normal. you don't race in reverse, do ya? even my 1:1 scale cars are like that.
|

09-30-2003, 06:51 PM
|
|
Master Debater
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 312
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ax0n
even my 1:1 scale cars are like that.
|
1:1 cars are like that because their is only 1 reverse gear and about 4 forward gears.
|

10-01-2003, 01:49 AM
|
|
Tool User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Indy, IN, USA
Posts: 442
|
|
|
Actually with real cars it's a matter of gear ratio. (reverse is numerically higher than first, or any other forward gear) reverse gives more torque, lower speed, and thus more control.
With R/C it's a matter of how reverse is just there to save you from having to have Turn Marshalls everywhere, and make it a little more realistic. So be glad they even included one!!
__________________
Trying to quench our need for 1/70 scale speed!
-
|

10-01-2003, 07:01 AM
|
|
Master Debater
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 312
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by frizzen
Actually with real cars it's a matter of gear ratio. (reverse is numerically higher than first, or any other forward gear) reverse gives more torque, lower speed, and thus more control.
|
You mean reverse is lower than 1st right?
|

10-01-2003, 10:37 AM
|
|
|
|
I believe that's what he is saying, however, in my 1981 accord (I rebuilt the transmission) reverse was actually first gear with one idler gear in the way to reverse the direction it turns. So reverse was literally identical to 1st in that car, torque and gear ratio wise. Also considering that I've goten up to 35 MPH in reverse in one of my cars (it's speedometer reads reverse speed too), I'd say it's very similar too.
|

10-01-2003, 01:39 PM
|
 |
Acura RSX
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ellicott City, Maryland
Posts: 1,892
|
|
Yup. I noticed that too. It would be weird if the reverse was actually faster than the acceleration.
|

10-02-2003, 02:31 AM
|
|
Tool User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Indy, IN, USA
Posts: 442
|
|
|
Yeah, you read that correctly. I didn't feel like including numbers to clarify/confuse the issue.
And as with all things automotive, there are exceptions to every rule. I happen to drive American domestics, and some aircooled German; and with the ones I own, they have the lower reverse than first gear.
-
God I wish they had something other than the RX-7 SE at my Radio Hack.
__________________
Trying to quench our need for 1/70 scale speed!
-
|

10-02-2003, 10:25 AM
|
 |
Garage Rocker
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 516
|
|
|
The forward is faster because they stacked a couple transistors in the forward position, cutting resistance in half.
|

10-04-2003, 10:19 AM
|
 |
Tiny RC Guru
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: asheville,NC
Posts: 271
|
|
tanx guys i get it now
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM.
|
|